[mu OT] glibc (was: Does this really...)

From: Mark Roberts (mu@manumark.de)
Date: Tue Aug 08 2000 - 15:59:54 CEST

Next message: Mark Roberts: "Re: TeX/LaTeX -- How to view?"
Previous message: Mark Roberts: "[mu TECH]: Running 'jove' in mulinux"
In reply to: David Turley: "Re: Does this really no one know?"
Next in thread: David Turley: "RE: [mu OT] glibc (was: Does this really...)"
Reply: David Turley: "RE: [mu OT] glibc (was: Does this really...)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Dear David,

> > Same answer as to so many questions: mulinux uses libc5, whereas all big
> > distros updated to glibc last year. Maybe somebody can tell me why they
> > did.
>
> Single disk distribution -->> small size.

Sorry, you misunderstood my question: Why did the big distros go for
glibc? What's so good about glibc? This question is definitely off topic

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk

Next message: Mark Roberts: "Re: TeX/LaTeX -- How to view?"
Previous message: Mark Roberts: "[mu TECH]: Running 'jove' in mulinux"
In reply to: David Turley: "Re: Does this really no one know?"
Next in thread: David Turley: "RE: [mu OT] glibc (was: Does this really...)"
Reply: David Turley: "RE: [mu OT] glibc (was: Does this really...)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:15 CET