From: Michele Andreoli (m.andreoli@tin.it)
Date: Mon May 22 2000 - 19:48:22 CEST
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 05:03:06PM +0200, Emmanuel Thiry nicely wrote:
> On mulinux@sunsite.auc.dk, Neo wrote:
>
>
> > > Try v9r1b.
> > > I had to set USR_RAW_SIZE to 2890 in mu.cnf too.
> > >
> > > Emmannuel Thiry
> > 9r1b was not on sunsite, but I'll have a try on USR_RAW_SIZE=2890. Thank
> > you.
> >
>
> You're welcome, but setting USR_RAW_SIZE to 2890 is a bad workaround
> because 2890 is the size that /usr takes in ram, whereas 1930 (the original
> value) would be enough.
> I've just found out today that what is lacking on USR is not space but
> inodes ! In my case, USR was formatted with 248 inodes when 298 were
> needed. So I increased the number of inodes to 350 by adding in mu file, in
> USR section, around line 272, the option "-N 350" to the mkfs.ext2 call.
> This line now reads :
> eval mkfs.ext2 $MKFS_OPT -N 350 USR
This is (-N) some news switch add in recent release of mkfs.ext2: I only
know the switch -i (byte-per-inode)
Michele
-- I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't remember any. Would two negative ones do? -- Woody Allen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:14 CET