Re: muLinux question.

From: Michele Andreoli (m.andreoli@tin.it)
Date: Tue Jan 18 2000 - 14:23:54 CET


On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 08:49:00AM +0000, ChBeer@t-online.de nicely wrote:
> Thank you Michele for your fast reply.
>
> Module-programming and general-purpose-programming are the ones I am
> thinking about.
>
> Thanks Christian Beer

very good. I think module-programming is perfectly possible with
Elinux. This save a lot of good book about "Module Programming" for
the 2.0.* kernel series.

It have to works, because do not requires header files other you
find in the kernel's source. And because the result of compilation
is a un-linked module .o, no other shared libraries are required.
We need only "gcc", "make" and "vi".

Michele

-- 
I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't 
remember any. Would two negative ones do?       -- Woody Allen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:13 CET